SECTOR / CPG
Know what deserves shelf space before you fund the launch.
For insights, innovation, and RGM teams: test the product, price, pack, and claim decisions before the launch budget locks. Subconscious turns one plausible answer into thousands of measured shopper experiments.
66%
Of shoppers enter the store with a brand already in mind. The money is in knowing which price, pack, and claim makes them switch, buy, and buy again.
THE DECISION
Old world
Commit production, inventory, and launch media based on surveys asking shoppers which products and claims they prefer. Learn after the item reaches shelf that demand was overstated for the wrong pack or flavor.
New world
Test price, pack, claim, and launch message against modeled purchase behavior. Avoid overcommitting 15,000 units of a configuration carrying $4,000 in contribution margin per unit, $60M in margin at risk.
Pressure-test $60M in production decisions before the line runs.
How the figure is built
- Units at risk in the overcommitted configuration
- 15,000
- Contribution margin per unit
- $4,000
15,000 × $4,000 = $60M in margin resting on the configuration call
Modeled economics on a representative decision, not customer results. Audited customer records are at subconscious.ai/case-studies.
THE TIMING SHIFT
- Ideas
- Price
- Pack
- Retailer proof
- Launch
- Ideas
- Price
- Pack
- Retailer proof
- Launch
CAUSAL OPERATING LOOP
KPI shift
More shots at the shelf, with less margin risk.
Shelf-space proof
A few ideas survive calendar reviews.
Products, prices, packs, and claims tested before the retailer meeting.
Margin control
Price moves show up as lost volume weeks later.
Margin, buy rate, and repeat risk are modeled before the move.
Trade spend
Promos are judged after the window closes.
Trade choices are ranked before the budget is committed.
ONE CAUSAL ANSWER
Which product earns the shelf, protects margin, and gets bought again?
Walk into the retailer meeting with a ranked slate: what to launch, where to price it, which pack to show, which claim to lead with, and what each move does to category value.
MODEL-PREDICTED
Predicted first, then measured.
The same method, audited: a 50ml facial moisturizer conjoint replicated from demographics alone and checked against the client's own 2,000-respondent study.
- Predicted
- Choice distributions and attribute-level preferences for a 50ml facial moisturizer, generated from demographics alone with no preference data and no choices from the real survey.
- Observed
- Mintel's own conjoint, fielded to 1,000 human respondents and repeated on a second 1,000 as blind validation.
- Agreement
- 0.79 to 0.88 Jensen-Shannon similarity across attribute distributions, above the 80% bar Mintel set in advance. The two diverged at the top of the price range, where human demand drops sharply above $34 and the model assumed a smoother decline.
PROOF
93%
validated against human outcomes
350+
replicated human studies
5 min
to run the next decision
SOC 2
enterprise-ready deployment