Skip to content

Causal experiments for business decisions

Test the decision.
Then make it.

Compare a price, product, or message in a causal experiment before you commit capital.

// Users

Used across category leaders.

// Category

See what each option causes.

Effect. Uncertainty. Action.

Subconscious runs randomized experiments on a simulation of your market, validated against real human behavior.

You get the estimated effect of each option, the confidence interval, and a clear next move.

// Decisions

Three decisions. One test.

01

Price

Compare price and package options before revenue is at risk.

02

Product

Test which feature, offer, or assortment deserves capital.

03

Message

Measure which claim changes customer choice before launch.

// Method

From question to action.

// Price decision

  1. 01

    Define

    Name the options and the outcome.

  2. 02

    Connect

    Bring the evidence that defines the market.

  3. 03

    Test

    Randomize the intervention.

  4. 04

    Decide

    Compare effect and uncertainty.

Options
$39 / $49 / $59
Outcome
Customer choice
Effect
Estimated lift
Range
Confidence interval
Decision
Act, revise, or stop

// Customers

Customer evidence.

A space tourism MVP shaped against a segment of fewer than 30,000 people worldwide, saving $8M in aerospace research.

Subconscious.ai augmented the [client's] space tourism MVP in minutes. No wasted iterations. Good press coverage — not price — is the primary driver in consumer preference for [the client].

Space tourism engagement, 2026 | A commercial spaceflight leader

River City Federal Credit Union lifted auto-loan ad Result Rate 42% and avoided $40,000 in testing costs.

We’ve been looking for ways to utilize data better to accomplish our mission of serving our community and members and are thrilled to be one of a select few organizations in the world that have access to this revolutionary technology. It’s exciting to see how harnessing the power of AI with a data-driven approach can improve campaign metrics.

Michael Quintanilla, CFO, River City Federal Credit Union | River City Federal Credit Union

Synthetic respondents reproduced Mintel's own moisturizer conjoint from demographics alone, with no choice data as input.

The best comparison we've done across all our work together.

Ezeugo Chukukere, Mintel, on the side-by-side results | Mintel

// Who we are

Leadership

Avi YashchinAY

Avi Yashchin

CEO and Co-Founder | Ex-Two Sigma quant. 2x exits to S&P 500. Guest lecturer at Wharton. Johns Hopkins CS, NYU Stern MBA

Dr. Subodh DubeyDSD

Dr. Subodh Dubey

Behavioral Economics | 20+ published papers. Pioneer in discrete choice theory

Tatevik KarapetyanTK

Tatevik Karapetyan

Research | Behavioral science researcher. Experimental design and causal inference

Connor JoyceCJ

Connor Joyce

Behavior Change | Microsoft. Behavioral science product leader. Ex-Twilio

// Evidence

Proof you can inspect.

Claim. Source. Limitation.

01

93% replication accuracy

93% is replication accuracy: how often simulated studies reproduce the direction and outcome of the original human studies. It is a validation result, not a guarantee for a new market.

Read the paper
02

Public leaderboard

See current cross-domain results and failure modes.

Open the leaderboard
03

Customer evidence

See decisions, outcomes, and source notes.

Read case studies
04

Security is reviewable

Enterprise security documentation is available in the Trust Center.

Open Trust Center

// Next

Make the decision with evidence.

Bring the decision. We will show you what can be tested.

Test a decision↗︎